Election Day: 7th May 2015

I voted this morning, having carefully weighed up a whole series of pros and cons that cannot be adequately expressed under a First Past the Post system.

My problem in this general election has been twofold:

1. My preferences for local candidate, national manifesto and Prime Minister were all from different parties

2. I’m in a two-way marginal seat with massive pressure to use my vote tactically

In the end, I voted for the local candidate that I most believed in, not the tactical choice. Every vote is counted, and I decided I would rather have mine counted for the person I would trust to represent my views in Parliament.

For me to tactically vote in a marginal constituency, it would have to either be to block a particularly nasty candidate, or to back someone who was close to what I wanted even if they wouldn’t naturally be my first choice. Neither of those cases applied.

In addition, I don’t believe in the concept of wasted votes. Parties will see their percentages rise and know to target that seat again next time; candidates will win back their deposits; politicians across the country will get the message that the era of two-party politics is truly over.

But because we are no longer in a two-party system, there is no need to continue using First Past the Post as our voting method for general elections. It no longer delivers a decisive result or a strong government, the two most prominent arguments in its favour. If we had the Single Transferable Vote, there would never need to be a choice between voting tactically and voting for the party or candidate you most believe in.

Whatever the results of this election, you can bet that for most of the parties there will be a huge discrepancy between number of seats won and national vote share. The order of who has done best will vary depending on whether parties are ranked by number of seats won or percentage of votes won. In a country that is so proud of its democratic nature, this is a nonsense. Parties also need to get used to the idea of working together, collaborating on policy rather than desperately scrabbling around for a Commons majority to secure power for themselves.

I think we’re in for a period of disillusionment between now and 2020, but the end result might be worth it. There just might be a new type of politics at the end of the tunnel.


3 thoughts on “Election Day: 7th May 2015

  1. This was a most fascinating election. When I heard the result I was depressed to see the Tories trounce everyone, but relieved that in fact Britain’s votes had delivered the nearest to stability that was possible in the circumstances – “the circumstances” being the fact that all the options seemed terrible! I don’t know whether a minority Tory government in a ramshackle alliance with the DUP, UKIP etc. or a minority Labour circling around the Scot Nats, UKIP etc. would have been more alarming. It is depressing to imagine the self congratulation going on though!

    Now, the EU referendum is on the horizon ….


  2. The thing that struck me was that both left and right ran negative campaigns, and we’ve ended up with a politics that not many people are happy with. Now that the Conservatives have a majority, it will be clear to what extent the Lib Dems had been influencing policy during the coalition, and I’m worried about what will happen to human rights, young people’s morale and our relationship with the EU over the next 5 years. But the left can now reform and present a strong, positive alternative. If they do so, we might end up with a more progressive centre ground and fairer voting system in the long run.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s